|
Braun S, Pantel K, Muller P, Wolfgang J, Hepp F, Kentenich
C, et al. The New England J of Med 2000; 342(8):525-533.
Prepared by: : Dr. Robin
Fainsinger
Received during: Journal
Rounds on the Tertiary Palliative Care Unit, Grey Nuns Hospital
Abstract:
Background: Cytokeratins are specific markers of epithelial
cancer cells in bone marrow. We assessed the influence of
cytokeratin-positive micrometastases in the bone marrow on
the prognosis of women with breast cancer.
Methods: We obtained bone marrow aspirates from both
upper iliac crests of 552 patients with stage I, II, or III
breast cancer who underwent complete resection of the tumor
and 191 patients with nonmalignant disease. The specimens
were stained with the monoclonal antibody A45-B/B3, which
binds to an antigen on cytokeratins. The median follow-up
was 38 months (range, 10 to 70). The primary end point was
survival.
Results: Cytokeratin-positive cells were detected in
the bone marrow specimens of 2 of the 191 control patients
with nonmalignant conditions (1 percent) and 199 of the 552
patients with breast cancer (36 percent). The presence of
occult metastatic cells in bone marrow was unrelated to the
presence or absence of lymph-node metastasis (P = 0.13). After
four years of follow-up, the presence of micrometastases in
bone marrow was associated with the occurrence of clinically
overt distant metastasis and death from cancer-related causes
(P < 0.001), but not with locoregional relapse (P = 0.77).
Of 199 patients with occult metastatic cells, 49 died of cancer,
whereas of 353 patients without such cells, 22 died of cancer-related
causes (P < 0.001). Among the 301 women without lymph-node
metastases, 14 of the 100 with bone marrow micrometastases
died of cancer-related causes, as did 2 of the 201 without
bone marrow micrometastases (P < 0.001). The presence of
occult metastatic cells in bone marrow, as compared with their
absence, was an independent prognostic indicator of the risk
of death from cancer (relative risk, 4.17; 95 percent confidence
interval, 2.51 to 6.94; P < 0.001), after adjustment for
the use of systemic adjuvant chemotherapy.
Conclusion: The presence of occult cytokeratin-positive
metastatic cells in bone marrow increases the risk of relapse
in patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer.
Comments:
Strengths/uniqueness: This report presents
a large cohort of patients comprehensively studied and followed
for four years.
Weakness: There is no discussion of whether
the follow-up may have been influenced by knowledge of presence
or absence of micrometastases. We are not told whether patients
were informed of their micrometastases status, and the ethics
of withholding this information.
Relevance to Palliative Care: The confirmation
of early micrometastases (often already present in Stage I)
is important information for palliative care practitioners,
who frequently have to counsel distressed patients and family
over issues of guilt (e.g. "I should have done self-examination/mammography")
and anger (perception of failure of the health care system).
Phase III evaluation of
fluoxetine for treatment of hot flashes. Downloadable
PDF File
Loprinzi CL, Sloan JA, Perez EA, Quella SK, Stella PJ, Mailliard
JA, Halyard MY, Pruthi S, Novotny PJ, Rummans TA. Journal
of Clinical Oncology Vol 20 (6) 1578-1583
Prepared by: Dr. Sharon Watanabe
Received during: Journal Club, Tertiary Palliative Care
Unit, Grey Nuns Community Hospital
Abstract:
Purpose: Hot flashes can be a prominent problem in women
with a history of breast cancer. Given concerns regarding
the use of hormonal therapies in such patients, other nonhormonal
means for treating hot flashes are required. Based on anecdotal
information regarding the efficacy of fluoxetine and other
newer antidepressants for treating hot flashes, the present
trial was developed.
Patients and Methods: This trial used a double-blinded, randomized,
two-period (4 weeks per period), cross-over methodology to
study the efficacy of fluoxetine (20 mg/d) for treating hot
flashes in women with a history of breast cancer or a concern
regarding the use of estrogen (because of breast cancer risk).
Eligible patients had to have reported that they averaged
at least 14 hot flashes per week; they could have received
tamoxifen or raloxifene as long as they were on a stable dose.
The major outcome measure was a bivariate construct representing
hot flash frequency and hot flash score, analyzed by a classic
sums and differences cross-over analysis.
Results: Eighty-one randomized women began protocol therapy.
By the end of the first treatment period, hot flash scores
(frequency x average severity) decreased 50% in the fluoxetine
arm versus 36% in the placebo arm. Cross-over analysis demonstrated
a significant greater marked hot flash score improvement with
fluoxetine than placebo (P= .02). The results were not adjusted
for potential confounding influences, including age and tamoxifen
use. The fluoxetine was well tolerated.
Conclusion: This dose of fluoxetine resulted in a modest improvement
in hot flashes.
Comments:
Strengths/uniqueness:
This paper comes from a group that has an established track
record in conducting clinical trials of treatments for hot
flashes. The study appears to be methodologically sound.
Weaknesses:
The magnitude of fluoxetine's effect in relieving hot flashes
is relatively small, especially considering the significant
improvement of this symptom with placebo. As the study was
conducted in patients who were cancer-free, the tolerability
data are not generalizable to advanced cancer patients.
Relevance to Palliative Care:
Hot flashes do not appear to be a prominent symptom in the
terminal phase of cancer, although they may be more bothersome
earlier in the course of disease. For patients who are troubled
by this symptom, there is a growing body of evidence supporting
the role of antidepressants as a therapeutic option, particularly
when hormones are contraindicated. However, the modest symptomatic
benefit must be weighed against potential side effects, which
tend to be more pronounced in patients with advanced illness.
|