|
Okuyama T, Tanaka K, Akechi T, Kugaya A, Okamura H, Nishiwaki
Y, et al. J Pain Symptom Manage 2000; 22(1):554-4.
Prepared by: : Monique Bielech,
Pharmacist, Tertiary Palliative Care Unit, Grey Nuns Community
Hospital
Received during: Journal
Rounds on the Tertiary Palliative Care Unit, Grey Nuns Hospital
Abstract:
Objective: To describe the role of opioid antagonists
in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation and pruritus.
Data Sources: A MEDLINE search was performed (1966-February
2000) for narcotics and opioid antagonists. Results were limited
to English-language and clinical trials. Background information
was obtained from pharmacology and pharmacotherapy references
and review articles. Hand searching of selected bibliographies
yielded several references.
Study Selection and Data Extraction: Studies were reviewed
that examined the use of naloxone, naltrexone, and methylnaltrexone
for opioid-related constipation and pruritus. Selected citations
included various clinical trials and case series.
Data Synthesis: Opioids are used for cancer and nonmalignant
pain. Peripheral opioid receptor stimulation due to endogenous
(ie. endophins) or exogenous (ie. morphine) stimulants may
result in negative adverse effects, including constipation
and pruritus. Adjuvant agents, such as laxatives and antihistamines,
are often used to treat these adverse effects, but are themselves
associated with adverse effects and are sometimes ineffective.
Opioid antagonists have demonstrated reversal of peripheral
opioid receptor stimulation. Clinical trials show adequate
maintenance of pain control, as well as decreases in opioid-induced
constipation and pruritus.
Conclusions: Opioid antagonists offer a therapeutic
alternative to conventional adjuvant agents, with the risk
of loss of analgesia at higher doses. Methylnaltrexone offers
the advantage of peripheral action only and thus not reversing
analgesia. Results are promising; however, larger clinical
trials are necessary before opioid antagonists become the
standard of care for opioid-induced constipation and pruritus.
Comments:
Strengths/uniqueness: This is an up-to-date review
of the options available if considering opioid antagonist
treatment of constipation and pruritus. The authors point
to the need for larger clinical trials to determine efficacy,
appropriate dosing and preservation of pain control.
Weakness: The two most promising agents reviewed are
not commercially available. Methylnaltrexone is available
as an injection for experimental use only. The primary author
is in the employ of Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals.
Relevance to Palliative Care: Constipation is an ever-present
challenge in palliative care. The issue of prescribing opioid
antagonists for constipation does surface occasionally
but
soon disappears as an option when the consequences of analgesia
reversal are considered.
|